Fund Name | P/E Ratio | Earnings Growth | PEG Ratio |
S&P 500 Index (VFINX) | 19.6 | 9.5% | 2.06 |
Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX) | 22.4 | 7.5% | 2.97 |
Large Growth Index (VIGRX) | 25.3 | 12.6% | 2.01 |
Value Index (VIVAX) | 16.4 | 7.6% | 2.16 |
Mid-Cap Index (VIMSX) | 22.1 | 12.5% | 1.77 |
Small Cap Index (NAESX) | 25.2 | 8.5% | 2.96 |
Small Cap Growth Index (VISGX) | 33.1 | 14.9% | 2.22 |
Small Cap Value Index (VISVX) | 20.3 | 4.0% | 5.06 |
Some Observations:
- The first thing that catches the eye is the P/E ratio of Small Cap Growth index. At 33.1, it is way above the historical average.
- The lowest earnings growth is in the Small Cap Value index. The PEG of 5.06 indicates that the price we pay is much higher for the amount of growth.
- The lowest P/E honors are held by the Value index fund, which is basically a large cap value index fund for the comparison purposes. But, P/E at 16.4, it is still above the historical P/E average of the broader stock index.
- The lowest PEG honors goes to Mid Cap index fund. The reason for this low PEG is above average earnings growth of 12.5% and a P/E of 22.1 that is below small cap stocks.
- A blend index with P/E less than 20 is S&P 500 index.
- The PEG of Large Growth index fund is less than the S&P 500 index fund. Are Large Growth stocks undervalued?
- The PEG of Large Growth index is even less than the Value index fund. Are Large Growth stocks on sale?
3 comments:
This is a question rather than a comment. I was wondering how you get your charts into your blog? I haven't been able to figure that part out yet.
JLP
AllThingsFinancial@hotmail.com
http://AllThingsFinancial.blogspot.com
I know a little bit of html programming.
I am just talking about the relative valuations here. The price paid for "Growth" seems lower than the price paid for "Value" side of the spectrum. This does not imply that the "Growth" is absolutely undervalued. It is relatively undervalued.
Post a Comment