Let’s take a look at the numbers for the rolling one-year from 10/1/2003 to 9/30/2004. Each quarterly dataset has following four numbers: operating earnings, as reported earnings, core pre-pension earnings, and core earnings.
Quarter | Operating | Reported | Core Pre-Pension | Core |
10/01/2003 - 12/31/2003 | $14.88 | $13.16 | $12.93 | $12.93 |
01/01/2004 – 03/31/2004 | $15.87 | $15.18 | $14.02 | $13.75 |
04/01/2004 – 06/30/2004 | $16.98 | $15.25 | $14.51 | $14.03 |
07/01/2004 – 09/30/2004 | $16.88 | $14.18 | $14.18 | $13.66 |
Totals for the year | $64.61 | $57.77 | $55.64 | $54.37 |
At 9/30/2004 the S & P 500 index stood at 1114.58. Using this number let’s calculate the P/E ratio with each of the total earnings above.
Earnings | Operating | As Reported | Core Pre-Pension | Core |
P/E ratio | 17.25 | 19.29 | 20.03 | 20.50 |
The core pre-pension P/E is lower than Core P/E. This indicates that due to the higher stock market returns in this time period, the corporations had a net income from their pension plan investments.
Now, Let’s consider the flip of the P/E ratio. This is E/P ratio. This comes out to be about 5%. This means that if anyone invests $100 in S & P index fund, the total underlying return is 5%. The 10-year Treasury bond yield was around 4% in above-mentioned time-period. The stocks are cheaper by as much 20% by this valuation measure.
Historically, the stock market P/E has averaged about 15 with trailing 12-month earnings. On 9/30/2004, the stock market P/E stood at 20. By this historical measure the stocks are fairly valued at 54.37 * 15 = 815.55, which is about 25% below from the close of 1114.58 at 9/30/2004. According to this formula, the stocks are overvalued by as much as 25%.
1 comment:
i think your blog is real informative, would you be interested in doing a link exchange?
Larrin
http://www.forprofitideas.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment